TSA Officer Charged with Child Pornography

Michael Scott Wilson
Image: Baltimore County Police Department

The Transportation Security Administration has done it again. This time, 41-year-old TSA officer, Michael Scott Wilson of Redwing Drive in Perry Hall, Maryland was arrested on September 27, 2011 with possession and distribution of child pornography.

Just remember, the next time the TSA agent has his hands all over your child, he may be having the time of his life. If a guy likes looking at child porn, he probably gets a real charge out of feeling up an actual child while his parents stand by and watch helplessly. These child molesters are sick, and they love, power, submission, and access.

Michael Wilson may not be a representation of all TSA agents, but there certainly must be more like him in the TSA who have not yet been caught. This is exactly why people normally do not let strangers come up and paw their children. Some strangers are good, and some strangers terrible. Since parents cannot always tell who is good and bad, parents usually just do not let any strangers touch their children. Oddly, one of the very few places were strangers get to grope children with impunity is the TSA.

TSA Employee Arrested for Off-Duty Child Molestation

David Ralph Anderson
Photo: Elko County Sheriff’s Office

Given the Transportation Security Administration provides hands-on dream careers for child molesters who wish to go pro, it should not be surprising a TSA worker has been arrested on suspicions of multiple acts of off-duty lewdness with a girl younger than fourteen.

The precise age of the alleged victim is not yet known, but David Ralph Anderson of Spring Creek, Nevada has been accused of teaching sexual acts to a girl, touching her genitals, having her touch his genitals, rubbing lotion on her, touching her chest, giving her alcohol, showing her pornographic movies, etc. At the time of the arrest, David Anderson was working for the TSA at the Elko Area Regional Airport in Elko, Nevada.

Transgender Security Administration: Sexuality and Gender Issues Cause Confusion at TSA

Ashley Yang is a confused man/woman. He began life as a male, but has chosen to live life as a female. Ashley Yang takes female hormones, dresses like a woman, behaves like a woman, uses women's restrooms, etc. Yang, however, has not yet undergone gender reassignment, so Ashley is technically a male in the eyes of the Transportation Security Administration.

Ashley Yang's gender bending ways caused her problems in her job as a security checkpoint screener with the TSA at LAX. She applied for the job as a woman and was hired as a woman, but she informed the TSA of her gender history prior to a background check. (Yes, surprisingly, it appears the TSA actually does conduct background checks on at least some of the power-tripping, bumbling freaks they hire.)

The TSA offered Yang a chance to work with baggage, but Yang did not seem to be interested in the pirate's life of theft and freebooting that so many TSA baggage inspectors enjoy. Yang was interested in a different kind of booty and is more of a hands-on person. He/she probably joined the TSA with dreams of getting up close and personal with the endless stream of submissive airline passengers TSA victimizes on a daily basis.

Since the TSA considers Yang a male, they made him (an aspiring her) perform his/her job as a man. TSA management originally ordered Yang to dress as a man, wear a male hairstyle, use the men's restroom, etc. This man/woman was also ordered to pat-down only male passengers, and this is when the absurdities of TSA's intrusive pat-downs begin with regard to sexuality and gender issues.

Now, if you are a man, would you rather receive a pat-down from straight man or male who has made some rather serious and obvious commitments to live life like a woman? When that hand is sliding around your testicles and anus, do you want that to be the hand of a straight guy or someone who may have some unconventional and flexible ideas about sexuality and gender roles? Really, it is your genitals, so who do you want touching them? If you are a man, do you suppose you would be more comfortable being touched by a cross-dressing, hormone-altered man or a straight woman? Would you prefer to receive a pat-down from a gender-switching male or a lesbian? Forgive the assumption here, but if given options, being touched by a man who longs to be a woman would probably be very far down on most straight men's lists of pat-down preferences.

On the surface, it seems like the issues here are sexual preference and gender, but these are only minor complications caused by a much more serious problem. The TSA's pat-downs themselves are too sexual. When it matters whether a pat-down is being performed by a male or female, then the pat-down is too intrusive and sexually charged. It should not matter whether the hand in your crotch is a male or a female hand, because that hand should not be in your crotch in the first place.

By the way, if you are a man, and you actually do want a personal pat-down from Ashley Yang, you will not enjoy the pleasure of getting a federally sanctioned groping for free at LAX. You will have to track down Ashley Yang and ask him directly for a freelance pat-down. Ashley Yang was fired from the TSA for using the women's restroom at work, making him perhaps the most harmless person ever to be fired by the TSA. Normally, to get fired by the TSA, an agent has to do something big like steal from passengers, beat up a coworker, commit rape, kidnap someone, etc. Failure to stop bombs, weapons, and terrorists from getting onto airplanes are not always grounds for dismissal at the TSA. Competence and public safety is a lesser concern there. If a person wants to get fired by the TSA he/she had better be prepared to do something either really nasty or just use the wrong restroom.

Mother Arrested After Confrontation with TSA over Pat-Down of Daughter

Andrea Fornella Abbott of Clarksville, Tennessee got angry on July 9, 2011 when the Transportation Security Administration wanted to pat-down her daughter when they were preparing to fly to Baltimore from the Nashville International Airport.

Abott insisted she did not want her daughter to be “touched inappropriately" or have her “crotch grabbed,” by the TSA. Of course the TSA cannot let innocent young flesh pass through its domain without copping a feel or at least capturing some naked body scans, so the TSA insisted.

According to, TSA goon, Sabrina Birge, the anger elevated, and Abott become irate. When Abott yelled and cursed at the sensitive TSA workers, she was arrested for disorderly conduct and hauled off to jail. Abott was later released on bond.

Not only did this woman's daughter nearly become a victim of a federally sanctioned sex crime, she missed her flight, and had to watch her mother go to jail. We will never know what sort of horrible terrorist attack was thwarted by the TSA when this angry mother was arrested and taken to jail. Hmm, if someone insisted on molesting your daughter, do you think you might get just a little upset?

TSA Pat-Down on Baby

TSA Performing Pat-Down on Baby

You may sleep well tonight knowing the TSA is doing all it can to protect you from the terrifying surge of baby bombs. Some of us have read about the horrible practice of babies being used in exploding booby traps during the Vietnam War to injure American soldiers, so we cannot be too careful, right? What will happen if an al-Qaeda operative finds a book in a library and gets inspired to hide a bomb in a baby's diaper? Apparently, that is a tremendous threat, so the TSA is feeling up the babies now.

Take a long hard look at this photo. This is what it looks like when freedom begins to die.

Gay TSA Screeners and Same-Gender Pat-Downs: A Touch of Confusion

TSA Pink Triangle Badge

The Transportation Security Administration proudly proclaims there is nothing sexual about their pat-downs, which happen to include significant contact with breasts, butts, inner thighs, and sometimes even genitals. The TSA claims to ensure the intrusive pat-downs are completely platonic by matching up the passengers with screeners of the same gender. This begs the question: What does the TSA do about the homosexual TSA screeners?

There are plenty of homosexual members of American society. They have jobs in every industry. Clearly homosexual people work for the government, and it just seems obvious that there must be some homosexual people working for the TSA. Are these homosexual TSA employees allowed to conduct pat-downs on airline passengers?

This is a legitimate question, because the TSA pat-downs do involve intimate contact. In fact, the contact during these pat-downs is so intimate that TSA screeners should be (and may be at some point in the future) tried for sexual assault. We have federal employees fondling people's genitals in airports all over the country right now. In almost any other situation, if one person fondles another person's genitals in an unwelcome fashion, the offender will get arrested.

The TSA seems to think it is important to gender-match passengers and the TSA screeners conducting the pat-downs; therefore, the TSA must see the obvious potential for a pat-down turning into a sexually charged encounter. Certainly, we can all see the potential problem with a heterosexual man patting down an attractive woman. Allowing a heterosexual man to rub his hands all over the breasts and crotch of a woman may very well take on an unwanted sexual element. The man may abuse the opportunity to get in a little extra touching for his own sexual gratification, and the woman will be left feeling understandably violated. This could also apply if a straight woman were to pat-down a male passenger.

Since the TSA seems to understand the pat-downs could become sexually charged, how is the TSA handling the issue of homosexual TSA screeners and homosexual airline passengers? If the pat-downs are too sexual for straight men to pat-down heterosexual women and vice versa, then the pat-downs must also be too sexual for other combinations where sexual tensions and attractions could exist. Here are a few examples.

• a heterosexual man pats down a gay man
• a gay man pats down a heterosexual man
• a gay man pats down a gay man
• a heterosexual woman pats down a lesbian
• a lesbian pats down a heterosexual woman
• a lesbian pats down a lesbian

In all of these scenarios, at least one person could be made to feel uncomfortable. In the scenarios where the TSA screener could potentially be sexually attracted to the passenger, there is a clear opportunity for sexual violations. What is the TSA doing to protect the employees and passengers from this?

It would not be fair to bar homosexuals from being TSA screeners; however, there are few scenarios where a homosexual TSA screener can conduct a pat-down on a passenger without creating some sort of potential for trouble. If a gay man pats down a heterosexual man, the heterosexual man may get violated. If a gay man pats down a gay passenger, the gay passenger may get violated. If a gay man pats-down a heterosexual woman, the woman may feel uncomfortable being touched by a man. It works the same way in reverse with lesbian TSA screeners.

Homosexuals cannot conduct pat-downs without upsetting just about every group of people. The only scenario that might work is to restrict gay men to conducting pat-downs on lesbian passengers. Perhaps the lesbian passengers could identify themselves as homosexuals and request gay male TSA screeners for their pat-downs. That way everything can remain platonic. Conversely, maybe the lesbian TSA screeners could be restricted to conducting pat-downs on only gay men who wish to declare their sexual orientation to the TSA. Maybe, to keep the confusion to a minimum, all of the homosexuals could wear inverted pink triangles on their shirts. That way, the screeners and the passengers could find an even greater sense of security in knowing the sexual orientation of everyone passing through the TSA checkpoints. Hopefully, by now, you are seeing how ridiculous this is.

If things are not ridiculous enough for you yet, ask yourself how the TSA should be handling transgender employees and transgender airline passengers. The issue gets even crazier when you consider that some TSA screeners and airline passengers may not be clearly classified as either male or female. Some people are going through gender changes that take years. Other people were born hermaphrodites and have no choice. Should people who are not obviously one gender or another be expected to choose a gender when approached by the TSA at an airport? This gender-bending stuff is going to get way too confusing, so let's just skip this and get back to the main issue: how the TSA addresses the concerns of homosexual screeners and passengers.

A fact of life is that some men are attracted to other men, and some women are attracted to other women. We cannot expect the homosexual men and women who work for the TSA to officially declare their sexuality and recuse themselves from same-gender pat-downs. We also cannot expect homosexual passengers to declare their sexuality to the TSA to avoid same-gender pat-downs.

By now, hopefully the absurdity of this article has exposed the true problem. The problem here is not gender or sexual orientation. The problem is the pat-downs. The pat-downs are far too intrusive, and they are violating common human dignity. The questions should not be about whether or not the TSA screeners might find the pat-downs sexually gratifying or whether or not the passengers might find the pat-downs to be sexual. The question should be this: Should government workers be permitted to stick their hands in the sexually sensitive areas of innocent people's bodies without probable cause?

People are straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, etc. People just have different lifestyles. Even though these groups all have their differences, they are human beings and deserve basic human dignities. When a law-abiding citizen goes to the airport, that person deserves the respect of not being treated like a criminal. At the very least, people should be able to travel freely in America without the overwhelming fear of being molested by a government employee.

Miss USA, Susie Castillo, Sexually Molested by TSA Screener

Susie Castillo - Miss USA 2003

www.susiecastillo.net

The latest addition to an ever-growing list of people sexually molested by the Transportation Security Administration happens to be a celebrity. Susie Castillo, Miss USA 2003, recently went through a TSA pat-down in the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, and a TSA screener touched her breasts, butt, and thighs. She even touched Castillo's genital area four times. Susie Castillo is an incredibly attractive Latina woman, so the TSA screener probably got a little too excited by Castillo's exotic attractiveness and decided to get a nice feel of the beauty queen's vagina.

People are going to come to the TSA's defense and say a woman conducted the pat-down, so there could not have been anything sexual about the touching. Do these people honestly believe that none of the female TSA screeners are lesbian or bisexual? There are plenty of lesbian and bisexual women in other careers, why would there not be at least a small percentage working for the TSA? It is just a fact of life that some women are sexually attracted to other women. Even more women are sexually attracted to unusually gorgeous women.

Who is to say, this TSA agent did not abuse her power to grope Susie Castillo? Susie Castillo says her vagina was touched by this TSA agent, and the TSA seems to be encouraging this sort of touching. Susie Castillo's story is very believable.  She plans to file a complaint with the TSA.

Castillo should not expect too much to come of her complaint, however. If she was molested by the TSA screener (and she probably was), Castillo needs to contact the local police, have the TSA screener arrested, and see that she is brought up on charges for sexual assault.

When you grab a woman's vagina against her wishes, that is sexual assault, right? The laws have not changed, have they? Just because a person is wearing a federal uniform, this does not mean they automatically get to go around grabbing vaginas all day. Hmm, well, actually that is the case right now, but that doesn't mean it is right. If a woman does not want someone touching her vagina, nobody should touch it.  Is that such a difficult concept? Even if this sort of molestation is making people feel a little safer, we cannot live in a society where the federal government can just start rubbing people's crotches whenever there might be some sort of security threat.

Susie Castillo is understandably quite upset about this experience. Read more about it on her blog.

TSA Makes a "Game" out of Touching Children in Intimate Places

Ken Wooden, founder of Child Lures Prevention, is raising concerns about the Transportation Security Administration's methods for getting children to comply with TSA pat-downs. Just as many child molesters get children to allow sexual contact by calling the activities "games," the TSA is also training its professional friskers to get children to comply with enhanced pat-downs by calling the pat-downs "games."

The TSA screeners want to touch children's butts, inner thighs, breasts, and (perhaps) even genitals, but they would rather the children not scream when this is going on, so they try to make it easy or fun for the children. Quite similarly, child molesters want to touch children's butts, inner thighs, breasts, and (perhaps) even genitals, and they also would rather the children not scream when this is going on. The TSA screeners do the groping under the banner of security, and the perverts do the groping under the banner of pleasure. Nevertheless, both groups feel the need to touch children in intimate areas, and both groups are using similar tactics.

This "game" ploy is just one example of how the TSA pat-downs are conditioning or (unintentionally grooming) small children to be molested. So, when a pervert wearing the security guard uniform and badge he bought on eBay approaches a small child and wants to play a pat-down "game," how likely is it that the small child will understand that the child molester dressed as security guard is any different than the TSA screener at the airport?

TSA Conducts Pat-Down on Boy Going to Disneyland

TSA Pat-Down of Small Boy

Heather Sheahan is upset about how the TSA went too far with a pat-down of her eight-year-old son in the Portland Airport on their way to Disneyland. She specifically did not like the way the male TSA agent ran his hands up the insides of the boys thighs and up close to the little boy's genitals. You can learn more about the incident in this video.

TSA Validates Intrusive Pat-Down of Drexel Girl in New Orleans

Appropriate Glove for TSA Pat-Downs on Children

If you thought the TSA's disgusting groping of the six-year-old Drexel girl in New Orleans was just an isolated incident, mistake, or deviation from standard operating procedure, think again. The TSA has come out and addressed this specific incident on their blog.

The TSA is confirming that it is their policy to pat-down small children in this manner. A procedure that is tantamount to child molestation is actually among the standard operating procedures of the TSA. The TSA is unapologetic about this incident and has officially confirmed they will continue to grope small children in this manner.

Wow, Michael Jackson would have loved to have worked for the TSA. They should put sequins on those rubber gloves to give the children the full Neverland Ranch experience.

TSA Pat-Downs Condition Children to Be Molested

Dr. Todd Drexel and Selena Drexel of Bowling Green, Kentucky are upset about the way a TSA agent patted down their six-year-old daughter at New Orleans Armstrong International Airport on April 5, 2011. The female agent intentionally touched the girl's butt, right breast, and inner thigh. The agent also stuck her fingers inside of the girl's pants at the waistband. According to the parents, the little girl was calm during the pat-down, but she broke down in tears afterward.

Of course, the girl broke down in tears. She just had her personal space violated by a stranger. Parents tell their children to not allow strangers to touch them in private areas of their bodies, but that is exactly what this TSA agent did. Not only did this agent upset this child by effectively molesting her, a precedent has been set in the girls mind that she may be touched by strangers under some circumstances.

People will argue that children get touched by their pediatricians on almost every visit, but this is different. The doctor's office is a secure, safe, and private place, and--most importantly--the child's pediatrician is not a stranger. The child understands it is okay to be touched by a known pediatrician in a doctor's office with a parent present. That is a very clear circumstance with well-defined boundaries and conditions.

Being fondled by some complete stranger in a crowded and chaotic public place (such as an airport) is an entirely different scenario. The boundaries are unclear, and the child may have a tremendous amount of trouble understanding why it might be okay to get fondled in public under some circumstances and not others.

The fact the TSA officers who are fondling these children are in uniform does not help much. All sorts of people own uniforms. To a child, a TSA agent is no different than the private security guard they might encounter in the bathrooms at the mall. Think about this through the mind of a small child: "If a uniformed authority figure can touch all over my body in a crowded airport, why should a uniformed authority figure not touch me in the mall bathroom?"

To an adult, the difference is obvious, but a child may not fully understand the difference. At the very least, a child who has already been felt-up by a TSA agent might be just a little more willing to be felt-up by someone else.

These horribly intrusive pat downs are technically child molestation, and they are conditioning children to passively accept being touched in their private areas by strangers. We should be ashamed of ourselves for allowing our Federal government to abuse and psychologically damage children in this way.

TSA Child Pat-Down Is Child Molestation

TSA Agent Pats Down Six-Year-Old Girl

In this YouTube video, you can see a TSA pat-down of a six-year-old girl. You will notice that the female TSA screener touches the girl's butt, sticks her fingers inside of the girl's pants at the waistband, rubs her inner thighs, and touches the girl's right breast.

If this occurred at a public park, mall, or school, the adult would be arrested and convicted of child molestation. It would be an open-and-shut case. The adult would go to jail and be a registered sex offender for life.

Any rational person would agree that adults may not touch children in this manner, but since this adult happens to be wearing a Federal uniform, somehow this is considered perfectly legal.  We should be ashamed of ourselves for allowing children to victimized in this way.

TSA Surpasses NAMBLA As the Largest Group of Child Molesters in America

Small Child Getting TSA Pat-Down

For many years, NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) was the largest organized group of child molesters in the country. They have now been surpassed by the Transportation Security Administration. The TSA's controversial radiation-based full-body scans have put parents in a horrible predicament. If a child is selected for a full-body scan at an airport security screening checkpoint, the parent must then choose between having his or her child exposed to the radiation of the full-body scanner or subjecting the child to groping by a TSA employee in the optional pat-down. Either way, the child gets exposed to things a child should never have to endure: radiation, exploitation, and molestation.

No matter which option the parent chooses, the TSA will commit a felony against the child. If the TSA scans your child in a full-body scan, they will be capturing an image of a child's naked body. This is child pornography. Imagine if some adult were going to a playground with one of these full-body scanning machines in a van and demanding children pose for it with their arms and legs spread so he could virtually peak under their clothes. The pervert would be arrested within an hour and spend years in prison.

If the parent wishes to not subject the child to posing for child pornography, the child may have his or her entire body touched by an absolute stranger during a pat-down. TSA employees may even touch the child's genitals. Intentionally touching a child's genitals without a specific medical reason is child molestation. Imagine if a school teacher went poking around a random child's crotch to make sure the child did not have any contraband in his or her underwear. The teacher would be fired and arrested as soon as the parents found out about it.

This is what the TSA has brought us. They take naked images of our children or fiddle with our kids' genitals. Either way, the TSA gets to engage in felonious and exploitative sexual acts with whichever children they happen to choose from the airport security screening lines. This is a child molester's dream come true. They get to pick children out of a line (like a perverse smorgasbord of innocent young flesh) and then get to either allow a complicit colleague to virtually look under the child's clothes or just feel up the kid directly. Even better, the parent gives permission and stands by helplessly while it happens. Best of all for the perverts, they get paid to do this all day and never get arrested. The TSA is paradise for anyone who likes to look at naked kids or grope them, and your tax dollars are funding the whole thing.

Are you a parent? Are you concerned that a child molester might be thrilled at the idea of having a job where an adult gets paid to look at naked images of children and/or touch children's genitals? Does it bother you that a TSA employee may be finding sexual gratification by looking at or touching your child under the guise of security?