The National Sheriffs' Association Wants Internet Data Retention Rules

The National Sheriffs' Association wants more control over Internet service providers by requiring ISPs keep records of Internet usage for a minimum of eighteen months. This is all being done under the guise of fighting child pornography, but it could affect anyone who uses the Internet.  This further invasion of privacy, which is to be imposed on private companies and presumably at their own expense, is going to make it much easier for all sorts of government agencies to spy on you. 

Hey, here's an idea.  If child pornography is such a big problem, maybe we should stop constantly letting the sex offenders out of prison.  If we keep more perverts in jail and away from kids and computers, maybe a lot the child pornography problems will go away.

Click below to read Declan McCullagh's full article on CNET News.
"Police: Internet Providers Must Keep User Logs"

TSA Security Screener Arrested for Child Pornography

TSA Screener, Thomas Gordon Jr.

Image: AFGE

Thomas Gordon, Jr., a TSA screener at Philadelphia International Airport, was arrested on March 24, 2011 on charges of distributing child pornography. Gordon got caught uploading sexually explicit images of minors to Photobucket. He also had the bright idea to upload a photo of himself in his TSA uniform. When Gordon was arrested, a search of his computer equipment turned up more than six hundred pieces of child pornography.

This is one of the many reasons adults should not be allowed to touch children in intimate areas unless there is a specific medical need to do so. In Philadelphia, we had this pervert groping all sorts of people under the guise of security.

Who knows how many children were groped by Gordon? Clearly, Gordon finds children sexually attractive. Are we to believe his TSA-sanctioned pat-downs of children were professional and completely within acceptable limits? Does anyone believe that this pervert did not at least occasionally take advantage of his job to indulge his sexual interest in children? If a pervert already has his hands all over a small child, how difficult would it be for him to sneak in a little extra groping for his own pleasure?

Well, here it is, parents. The TSA screeners are feeling up your kids. Sometimes these screeners are unsavory people. Sometimes these screeners may be rubbing their hands all over your kids and experiencing a great amount of pleasure doing do.

Think about it this way. Men, if you were required to rub your hands all over Jessica Alba, Halle Berry, Heidi Klum, and Megan Fox, do you think you might find that experience at least somewhat exciting? Ladies, if you were required to rub your hands all over Tom Cruise, Ryan Reynolds, Jon Hamm, and Brad Pitt, do you think you might get a little aroused?

The sexual excitement you feel when you touch an attractive adult are the same feelings a child molester gets when touching a child. Keep this in mind the next time you go to the airport. If the TSA screener who is performing a pat-down on your child happens to be sexually attracted to children, that screener may be enjoying that encounter quite a bit and may take the opportunity to do something incredibly inappropriate with your child.

TSA Surpasses NAMBLA As the Largest Group of Child Molesters in America

Small Child Getting TSA Pat-Down

For many years, NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) was the largest organized group of child molesters in the country. They have now been surpassed by the Transportation Security Administration. The TSA's controversial radiation-based full-body scans have put parents in a horrible predicament. If a child is selected for a full-body scan at an airport security screening checkpoint, the parent must then choose between having his or her child exposed to the radiation of the full-body scanner or subjecting the child to groping by a TSA employee in the optional pat-down. Either way, the child gets exposed to things a child should never have to endure: radiation, exploitation, and molestation.

No matter which option the parent chooses, the TSA will commit a felony against the child. If the TSA scans your child in a full-body scan, they will be capturing an image of a child's naked body. This is child pornography. Imagine if some adult were going to a playground with one of these full-body scanning machines in a van and demanding children pose for it with their arms and legs spread so he could virtually peak under their clothes. The pervert would be arrested within an hour and spend years in prison.

If the parent wishes to not subject the child to posing for child pornography, the child may have his or her entire body touched by an absolute stranger during a pat-down. TSA employees may even touch the child's genitals. Intentionally touching a child's genitals without a specific medical reason is child molestation. Imagine if a school teacher went poking around a random child's crotch to make sure the child did not have any contraband in his or her underwear. The teacher would be fired and arrested as soon as the parents found out about it.

This is what the TSA has brought us. They take naked images of our children or fiddle with our kids' genitals. Either way, the TSA gets to engage in felonious and exploitative sexual acts with whichever children they happen to choose from the airport security screening lines. This is a child molester's dream come true. They get to pick children out of a line (like a perverse smorgasbord of innocent young flesh) and then get to either allow a complicit colleague to virtually look under the child's clothes or just feel up the kid directly. Even better, the parent gives permission and stands by helplessly while it happens. Best of all for the perverts, they get paid to do this all day and never get arrested. The TSA is paradise for anyone who likes to look at naked kids or grope them, and your tax dollars are funding the whole thing.

Are you a parent? Are you concerned that a child molester might be thrilled at the idea of having a job where an adult gets paid to look at naked images of children and/or touch children's genitals? Does it bother you that a TSA employee may be finding sexual gratification by looking at or touching your child under the guise of security?