If you ever needed proof the anti-Second Amendment people are unwise, here it is.
The Oakwood Apartments in Castle Rock, Colorado, under the Ross Management Group, has a new policy. After October 1, 2013, residents are not allowed to have firearms on the premises, including inside of their own apartments. Even current renters are not allowed to keep their firearms. Current renters must either dispose of their weapons or move. Those who do not comply with this gun ban face forcible eviction.
Now, the apartment complex is a business. As the owners of the property, they have a right to regulate what happens on their property. So, if the owners foolishly want to ban guns, that is their right to do so. That issue may not be that simple, however. This particular complex offers tax credit housing. If this business is being supported with tax-payer dollars, this creates a Constitutional issue. If tax dollars are supporting this complex, then the owners have no right to restrict the practice of Constitutional rights. (Note the President of Ross Management Group is Deborah Ross Weseloh. She is a Democratic Party donor.)
The idiocy behind this policy illustrates just how naive the whole gun control crowd is. Under this anti-gun policy, only the people who follow rules will obey it and dispose of their guns. So, only the people who follow the rules will be the ones without weapons. Since criminals do not follow rules, the criminals will still have guns, and they will have a huge advantage over the unarmed residents.
Look at this through the eyes of a criminal. If you were going to commit crimes, would you rather commit those crimes in a place where any resident might have a gun, or would you prefer to target a place where you know the residents are very likely to be unarmed. With this ridiculous ban on guns, the Oakwood Apartments has now made the complex an attractive target for criminals. Who would want to live in a place that criminals would see as an easy target? Maybe, to save everybody time, the residents of the Oakwood Apartments should just hand over their guns directly to the criminals who will be robbing them in the future.
If you have any concerns about the anti-gun policy of Oakwood Aprtments, contact them.
Oakwood Aprtments
559 Oakwood Drive
Castle Rock, CO 80104
Tel: (303) 688-5080
Fax: (303) 660-5409
Ross Management Group
4251 Kipling St, Suite 405
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Tel: (303) 860-7885
-----------------------------------------------------------
UPDATE 8/8/13: The Oakwood Apartments gun ban has been thrown out. This is probably due to bad publicity. The important thing to remember is that they tried it.
The Douglas County Housing Partnership owns the Oakwood Apartments, which was purchased with federal funds and continues to be supported with tax dollars from an array of government sources. The Ross Management Group will not be allowed to impose the gun ban they wanted to implement.
Showing posts with label Colorado. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Colorado. Show all posts
August 8, 2013
August 5, 2011
TSA Confiscates Pregnant Diabetic Woman's Insulin
The Transportation Security Administration should be protecting innocent people from the most dangerous people; however, the TSA seems to be preying on the weakest among us. The latest event in a never-ending series of abuses against people with handicaps and special medical needs, is the TSA's confiscation of a pregnant diabetic woman's insulin. The TSA at the Denver International Airport in Colorado, felt the woman's insulin was a threat to public safety, so they took it.
Fortunately for the woman, the TSA did their usual inadequate job, and they did not properly search her lunchbox. In their typical carelessness, the TSA searched only the top of the woman's lunchbox and missed half of a vial of insulin at the bottom of the lunchbox.
The woman, who wishes to remain anonymous out of fear of retaliation, claims she had a note from her doctor and the insulin bottles were labeled correctly. She does not understand why the TSA decided to take some of her medicine.
Fortunately for the woman, the TSA did their usual inadequate job, and they did not properly search her lunchbox. In their typical carelessness, the TSA searched only the top of the woman's lunchbox and missed half of a vial of insulin at the bottom of the lunchbox.
The woman, who wishes to remain anonymous out of fear of retaliation, claims she had a note from her doctor and the insulin bottles were labeled correctly. She does not understand why the TSA decided to take some of her medicine.
July 16, 2011
Tit-for-Tat As Passenger Gropes TSA Agent
On July 14, 2011, Yukari Mihamae, a sixty-one-year-old Longmont, Colorado woman, contacted the left breast of a female TSA agent at the Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix. Yukari Mihamae grabbed and squeezed the TSA agent's breast. Mihamae has been charged with a felony count of sexual abuse.
Ironically, if the TSA agent had grabbed and squeezed Yukari Mihamae's breast, the TSA agent would have faced not much more than having a meaningless complaint filed against her. It is quite possible nothing would have happened to the TSA agent. To keep out of trouble when you go to the airport, remember the TSA has the same policy as strippers: You can't touch them, but they can touch you.
Ironically, if the TSA agent had grabbed and squeezed Yukari Mihamae's breast, the TSA agent would have faced not much more than having a meaningless complaint filed against her. It is quite possible nothing would have happened to the TSA agent. To keep out of trouble when you go to the airport, remember the TSA has the same policy as strippers: You can't touch them, but they can touch you.
Labels:
agent,
Arizona,
breast,
Colorado,
Longmont,
pat-down,
Phoenix,
sexual abuse,
Sky Harbor International Airport,
touch,
TSA
July 9, 2011
Racial Quotas for Dolls in Colorado Daycares
The Colorado Department of Human Services is apparently concerned that there is not enough racial diversity among the dolls in daycares. A ninety-eight page document contains many proposed regulations in Colorado like requiring the daycare to obtain a note from a doctor to give a child whole milk. Even more ridiculous, the Colorado Department of Human Services wants daycares to have dolls that represent three races.
There is nothing wrong with dolls that represent different races. In fact, it is probably a good thing for children to see racial diversity among toys. The problem here is that the government of Colorado wants to demand private businesses purchase dolls of different ethnicities. How can these government officials possibly have time to worry about such petty things? This sort of decision be up to the privately owned daycare and the parents.
If you are living in Colorado and you are wondering why your taxes are so high, it is partly because you are paying a bunch of government officials to sit around a table a discuss racial quotas for dolls. Think about that next you pay your taxes.
There is nothing wrong with dolls that represent different races. In fact, it is probably a good thing for children to see racial diversity among toys. The problem here is that the government of Colorado wants to demand private businesses purchase dolls of different ethnicities. How can these government officials possibly have time to worry about such petty things? This sort of decision be up to the privately owned daycare and the parents.
If you are living in Colorado and you are wondering why your taxes are so high, it is partly because you are paying a bunch of government officials to sit around a table a discuss racial quotas for dolls. Think about that next you pay your taxes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)