Showing posts with label First Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label First Amendment. Show all posts

May 12, 2013

Principal, Jamille Miller Brown, Suspends Student for Posting Mug Shot


Jamille Miller Brown Mug Shot

The principal of Georgia's Riverdale High School, Jamille Miller Brown, got angry when Keandre Varner, one of her students, posted her mug shot on Instagram and speculated about her being arrested for DUI. Her claim is that she was actually arrested for failing to appear in court over a speeding ticket.

Jamille Miller Brown suspended Keandre Varner from school for "posting misinformation," and now the story has reached far beyond the halls of Riverdale High School. If that shortsighted principal had just swallowed her pride and let Varner post her mug shot, only hundreds would have seen her mug shot over a period of weeks. Instead, Jamille Miller Brown chose to be petty and infringe on a student's freedom of speech, which now means her mug shot will be seen by millions for the rest of her life.

In a couple of years, when people search for Jamille Miller Brown on the internet and find the results heavily cluttered with her mug shot and mentions of this incident, she will probably wish she had just left Keandre Varner and his freedom of speech alone.

April 25, 2011

How to Record Video of Abusive Police Without Getting Caught (So Easily)

With the growing prevalence of camcorders and cell phone video recorders, more civilians are shooting amateur video of police, and more police are getting into trouble for brutality, breeches of policy, illegal activity, excessive violence, unjustified use of weapons, intimidation, etc. Of course, law enforcement officers are getting increasingly sensitive about having their bad behavior captured on video, and they sometimes abuse their power to stop people from shooting video of police activity. Sometimes, police may seize cameras, intimidate camera operators, and even use physical violence to stop the video recordings.

Here is the deal. Generally, if police activity is going on in a public place and you are not interfering with that activity, the First Amendment gives you the right to capture that activity on video. Police can ask you to turn off your camera, but you generally do not have to turn off the camera if you prefer to continue recording. Also, provided you are not hindering an investigation, a policeman may not seize your camera.

Now, just because you have rights under the First Amendment, do not assume all cops will respect your rights. In fact, the cops who are probably the most shocking subjects to record are also the cops who are most likely to have a problem with being recorded. These cops may be prepared to go to great lengths to keep you from creating a permanent record of their behavior.

Well, if you want to record police, here are several methods and tips that will increase your chances of success and help protect your rights from police abuse. Before reading further, please understand that there may be laws specific to your local area that may place limits on your rights. Being aware of those laws will help keep you out of trouble and help you properly exercise your right to record the police in public. (Note: Some localities have specific laws about recording audio. Know these local laws.)

Buddy Method
Far and away, the best method for recording police is the buddy method. Using the buddy method, you record police however you desire (but without hindering official police work). Your buddy keeps a very low profile and shoots video from a distance through a zoom lens. You may choose to record audio with a backup source, such as a small pocket digital recorder. You may need the additional audio recording if your camera is forcibly taken, damaged, or voluntarily turned off due to police intimidation. Your buddy should be able to capture good video, but his audio will be very limited if he happens to be many yards from you while your rights are being violated by the police. The separate audio will become useful to accompany the long-distance footage shot by your buddy.

Candid Camera
There are many inexpensive tiny video cameras on the market. Some are small enough to conceal in clothing. If you want to get really serious about protecting your rights to record the police and your local laws allow hidden cameras, consider investing in one. If you are recording video on a hidden backup, you can turn off your visible camcorder whenever you choose without having to miss a moment of the action.

Innocent Bystander
Just because you want to record something, this does not mean you have to personally hold the camera. In many situations, you can start your camcorder, aim it, and conceal it in a bag, box, car, bushes, etc. You can simply linger in the area while your camcorder is capturing the action. Your camera may be capturing shocking video, but you will appear to be a casual bystander. When the event is over, casually retrieve your camera and head for home.

Bait and Switch
If you happen to catch some exceptionally interesting video, it would be a good idea to change videotapes or memory cards. If a cop illegally confiscates your camcorder, he may damage whatever tape or storage medium he finds inside. If you pocket the real tape in advance, the cop will destroy the dummy tape and assume he no longer has to worry about the evidence of his violations.

Red Light Stopper
Most videographers are not used to being in front of the camera, and they usually forget about something that everyone else notices. On many cameras, when the video camera is recording, a red light shines on the front of the camera. This red light makes people nervous, because it is a constant reminder that every moment is being captured forever. If you have a red recording light indicator on the front of your camcorder, deactivate it through the system menu, disconnect it, or simply cover it with a sticker or tiny piece of adhesive tape that matches the color of you camera's body. Electrical tape or duct tape will be adequate for most black or silver cameras.

Run Silent
Many camcorders beep when recording starts and stops. You can avoid drawing attention to your camcorder by turning off the beep function. Many cameras allow users to lower the volume of the beeps or turn the beeps off altogether.

Shoot from the Hip
When shooting video of a controversial event, avoid holding the camcorder up to your face. If you have a camera by your face, the subjects will be more aware that you are recording. Instead, make use of your camcorder's view screen and record casually from waist level or chest level. The less attention you draw to your camera, the more effective you will be as a videographer.

Safety in Numbers
If something exciting is going down, enlist the other random bystanders to shoot video. A lot of people have video-enabled cell phones. You can encourage them to shoot video as well. If the cops see one person shooting video, they may feel comfortable intimidating that one person. If the cops see multiple cameras, they might be more likely to behave themselves.

Be Smarter Than Your Smart Phone
Most smart phones have built-in video cameras. When shooting video with your phone, do not hold the phone at eye level in front of your face. Anyone within a hundred yards will know you are shooting video. To remain inconspicuous, hold the phone at chest level. Get your shot by watching the screen. Do not draw attention to yourself by looking directly at the action While you are shooting video, do something casual with your phone, such as pretending to type an email, browsing the Internet, talking on speaker phone, etc. If you do not look like a problem, you probably will not be treated like a problem.

You Have the Right to Remain Seated
For some reason, people tend not to notice seated people as easily as standing people. If you have the option of shooting good video from a sitting position, do so. If you can shoot video from within your own car, even better. If you shoot video with the windows up, you will lose a little image quality and have almost no audio, but you may be able to shoot video without drawing attention.

Inside Job
If you shoot video from inside of a building, your chances of being confronted get much lower. If you happen to own or rent that building, you have all sorts of legal protections. Even though you will lose much of the audio of the event, shooting video from inside may provide you with excellent vantage points, a great deal of privacy, and tremendous legal protection.

Closing Thoughts
Of course, you need to keep in mind that cops may become angry when being recorded on videotape and illegally use vicious force against you and your property. Additionally, you are fully responsible for being aware of all of your local laws and following them, but generally, you are allowed to peacefully record police who are operating in public as long as you do not obstruct their efforts.

Stand up for your First Amendment rights and use your camcorder legally against cops who break the law by abusing their power. You can do this, but just be smart about it. You may care about your rights, but the worst cops do not. Be careful, plan ahead just a little, and you might help get an abusive cop off the streets and create a better environment for the good cops who follow the rules and respect the rights of law-abiding civilians.

November 27, 2010

Homeland Security Seizing Domains Without Trial

The Department of Homeland Security has chosen to seize many domain names with little or no warning. The site seized by the Department of Homeland Security include sites that help people download torrents for copyrighted material, such as movies and music. The seized sites also include those that deal in suspected counterfeit designer goods like purses and watches.

The sites were simply seized without a trial, and this should horrify business owners. Apparently, if the Department of Homeland Security thinks your business aids people in acquiring counterfeit or pirated goods, Homeland Security can simply take your domain, essentially putting you out of business.

There is something even more terrifying to consider here. The practice of seizing domain names without a trial could be used to infringe on the First Amendment. Imagine if an online news site posts a video, photo, audio clip, or passage of text and the Department of Homeland Security thinks the owner of the domain posted the copyrighted content without proper permission. What is to stop the Department of Homeland Security from simply seizing the domain of the suspected site?

Imagine if the Department of Homeland Security decided to shut down sites that are critical of the government. All they would have to do is browse the site, find some piece of copyrighted content that appears to be used without proper permission, and seize the domain without a trail. This would allow the Department of Homeland Security to effectively shut down almost any site. Even if a site had proper permission to display every piece of its content, it would not matter. Since there does not need to be a trail, the owner of the Web site would not get a chance to defend itself, and the Department of Homeland Security could simply shut it down. The Department of Homeland Security effectively now has the power to eliminate free speech on the Internet.

When the Department of Homeland Security was created, we were told it was to protect us from terrorists and foreign invaders. How exactly is shutting down suspected torrent trackers and sellers of counterfeit goods protecting us from terrorists? The Department of Homeland Security is completely out of control. Today it is torrent trackers and counterfeit purse sellers. Who will be next?

For your reference, below is a list of the domain names currently known to have already been seized by the Department of Homeland Security. Certainly, many, many more will follow.



2009jerseys.com
51607.com
amoyhy.com
b2corder.com
bishoe.com
borntrade.com
borntrade.net
boxedtvseries.com
boxset4less.com
boxsetseries.com
burberryoutletshop.com
cartoon77.com
cheapscarfshop.com
coachoutletfactory.com
dajaz1.com
discountscarvesonsale.com
dvdcollectionsale.com
dvdcollects.com
dvdorderonline.com
dvdprostore.com
dvdscollection.com
dvdsetcollection.com
dvdsetsonline.com
dvdsuperdeal.com
eluxury-outlet.com
getdvdset.com
gofactoryoutlet.com
golfstaring.com
golfwholesale18.com
handbag9.com
handbagcom.com
handbagspop.com
icqshoes.com
ipodnanouk.com
jersey-china.com
jerseyclubhouse.com
jordansbox.com
lifetimereplicas.com
louis-vuitton-outlet-store.com
lv-outlets.com
lv-outlets.net
lv-outletstore.com
massnike.com
merrytimberland.com
mycollects.com
mydreamwatches.com
mygolfwholesale.com
newstylerolex.com
nfljerseysupply.com
nibdvd.com
odvdo.com
oebags.com
onsmash.com
overbestmall.com
rapgodfathers.com
realtimberland.com
rmx4u.com
scarfonlineshop.com
scarfviponsale.com
shawls-store.com
silkscarf-shop.com
silkscarfonsale.com
skyergolf.com
sohob2b.com
sohob2c.com
storeofeast.com
stuff-trade.com
sunglasses-mall.com
sunogolf.com
tbl-sports.com
throwbackguy.com
tiesonsale.com
timberlandlike.com
topabuy.com
torrent-finder.com
usaburberryscarf.com
usaoutlets.net

June 22, 2009

Federal Trade Commission Plans More Control over Blogs

The Federal Trade Commission is currently making plans to exercise more control over blogs. At issue is bloggers who endorse products and services. If a blogger endorses a product or service, the FTC wants to place the blogger under scrutiny to make sure the blogger is not receiving undisclosed compensation. For example, if a mother likes a toy she bought for her kids and writes a positive article about the toy, the FTC would want to make certain she did not receive any sort of compensation for the article from the manufacturer or retailers.

On the surface, this FTC initiative sounds like a commonsense measure to protect the consumer from false testimonials and deceptive marketing practices. The reality, however, is much worse. This move is probably just a way for the Federal government to expand its jurisdiction over blogs.

The blogosphere is one of the few places left where people can report and/or read unvarnished truth. Bloggers freely report what they see and know. Sometimes the bloggers are absolutely right, and sometimes they are dead wrong. Regardless, the blogger exercises his or her freedom of speech, and the Web community has the choice to accept or reject the blogger's facts and views. In an age of diminishing mainstream media, numerous press scandals, and outright bias in the major news outlets, the blogs have become an important tool for delivering news and commentary. Sometimes, the only place to find the truth is on a blog.

The Federal government currently has significant influence over major media outlets, so politicians and officials know they can somewhat manage their message in the mainstream press if need be. The politicians and officials have far less control over the blogs. They have to know that, when the rest of the media fails to report the truth to the population, the bloggers can still disseminate the important facts and write the tough things that need to be written. This freedom of expression has got to make a lot of powerful people nervous. Certainly, they are looking for a way to control the voices of the bloggers.

This FTC initiative is just the first intrusion into the Web-based free press. The Federal government will use this expanded jurisdiction as a launch pad for deeper intrusions. This year, the government wants to go after product endorsements. Next year they may want to go after political endorsements. Where does it stop? Perhaps, in a few years, any blogger who writes about politics or current events will have to register with the Federal Communications Commission and be subject to their scrutiny. What is we ever have a corrupt President who chooses to abuse this sort of authority.

The FTC's move to investigate blogs should deeply concern us all. When the Federal government begins exercising control over private citizens' freedom of speech, it jeopardizes the ability of private individuals to freely express opinions and report information. If you ever think you may want to express yourself on a blog or want to have the option of seeking the truth from independent citizen journalists, this affects you. Be concerned, because the First Amendment is in danger.

February 19, 2009

One Man’s Sign Affects Two of His Civil Rights

According to Bridget Nash of the Enid News and Eagle, Chip Harrison, an Oklahoma City man, was driving on the interstate with a sign in his window. The sign read, “Abort Obama, not the unborn.” The man was pulled over by an Oklahoma City police officer who confiscated the sign. The sign was later returned by the police department, but the Secret Service later visited the man’s house and asked to conduct an informal search. The Secret Service walked through Harrison’s house to determine if Harrison was a threat.

Harrison was unwise in the way he worded his sign, but government overreaction over Chip Harrison’s sign lead to infringements on his First and Fourth Amendment rights. Harrison did get his sign back, and he voluntarily allowed the Secret Service to search his house, but this event should be a warning to all that the reach of government is extensive. Who knows what might have happened to Harrison had he not cooperated with the police and Secret Service. Harrison probably has his own special Secret Service file now, but things could have been much worse for him if he had tried to stand up for his freedom of speech and his right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure.

Enid News and Eagle Article
"OKC Officer Pulls Man over for Anti-Obama Sign on Vehicle"